| The information
provided herein is general in nature and designed to serve as a
guide to understanding. These materials are not to be construed as
the rendering of legal or management advice. |
|
Inside this Issue:
|
Cobra Beneficiaries Entitled to Coverage under Employer's New
Health Insurance Coverage
COBRA, can be complicated for
employers, especially when switching health insurance companies, as
a case from Georgia illustrates. When the employee in that case was
terminated near the end of the year, the employer provided the
required COBRA election notice and the employee timely elected COBRA
coverage for himself and his spouse, paying the first month's
premium to the plan's insurer. At the start of the next year,
however, the insurer informed the employee that the employer had
changed insurers and that the couple no longer had coverage with it,
but rather with the employer's current provider. When the employee
contacted the employer, he was told to obtain COBRA coverage through
the old insurer. Sometime before the end of the 18-month COBRA
period, the couple sued the employer for COBRA violations. The
employer did not respond to the lawsuit and the court entered an
order of default.
|
|
Is
The Employer Required To Maintain Dental Coverage During
FMLA Leave?
The
federal Department of Labor (DOL) has issued an opinion letter to a school
district stating that the dental coverage it provides its employees must be
maintained during FMLA leave, the same as group health coverage is. The Family
and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and its regulations require employers to maintain
any “group health plan” coverage to an eligible employee on leave under the same
conditions as coverage would have been provided if the employee had been
continuously employed during the entire leave period. For example, if the
employer contributes 75% of the insurance premium while employed, it must pay
that amount while the employee is on FMLA leave.
|
|
Applicant
Strength Test was Gender Discrimination
An appeals court has upheld a
$3.4 million verdict against an Iowa meat processing plant
charged with discrimination against women because of a
pre-employment strength test it required new job applicants
to take. The case was brought by the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of 52 women who were
rejected for entry-level jobs at the Fort Madison Armour
Star meat plant which is owned by Dial Corporation.
At issue in the case was a
strength-testing requirement used in the plant to evaluate
job applicants, which was implemented in reaction to a large
number of workplace injuries. At trial, the EEOC provided
evidence that fewer women were hired after the testing was
implemented and that it had a disparate impact on women
because of the test's design.
|
|
|
Fewer Representation Votes Conducted In First Half of 2006
than In First Half of 2005
There were
fewer representation elections conducted by the National
Labor Relations Board during the first half of 2006 than
during the same period in 2005, according to NLRB data. The
union win rate also declined slightly from the previous
year. Unions won 485 of 802 elections (60.5%) held in the
first half of 2006, compared with 715 of 1,161 elections
(61.6%) in the same period of 2005.
|
|
|
Approaching Deadlines for Human
Resource/Payroll Professionals
|
|
|
Latest Department of Labor Numbers
|
|
|
Remove
yourself from future email here hr-onesales@hr-onesource.com
or reply to this message with the word 'remove' in
your email message subject line. |
|
|
|