According to a recent 8th Circuit Court of Appeals decision, regular
attendance is an essential function of a job, even when the employee’s absences
are for legitimate medical and personal reasons, and taken with the employer’s
permission.
James Schierhoff worked for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) as a packaging mechanic
until April of 2002, when his employment was terminated for excessive
absenteeism. Prior to that, Schierhoff had been absent from work for various
medical and personal reasons, including FMLA leave during both 2000 and 2001, as
well as additional personal time off in each of those two years.
Between June of 2000 and March of 2002, Schierhoff had "excused" absences
totaling 172 workdays, which equated to about 40 percent of the work time in
that period. In April of 2002, Schierhoff received a termination memo, stating
that his absences "have impaired the operation of the department and diminished
[his] effectiveness to the company."
Schierhoff sued GSK, alleging both age and disability discrimination.
Although he did not dispute the company’s assertion that he had often been
absent, Schierhoff claimed that he was terminated for other reasons.