The one stop source for all your human resource needs
Home • Request Info
Become a Members
Member Login
Products
Newsletter
Partners
HR One Source Staff
About Us
Services
HR Audits
Employee Hanbooks
Job Descriptions
Compensation
Investigations
Outplacement
Training
Executive Search
Labor Relations
Behavior Surveys
Other Services
Classes 2007 / 2008

EEOC Bias Complaints Surge
 

If the first few months of fiscal year 2008 are any indication of a trend, then the record number of charge filings with the EEOC could be shattered—and could make the 2007 increase look like a drop in the bucket.


During the first quarter of the EEOC's 2008 fiscal year the number of filings jumped 21 percent from the previous year.  In February 2008 (the latest statistics available), the number increased 31 percent from 12 months earlier—from approximately 30,000 filings to slightly more than 40,000.

The reasons for the increase in filings are multifaceted, and it would be a mistake to focus on just one cause, including, but not limited to, people being more aware of their rights, economic conditions, and increased diversity and demographic shifts in the labor force.
 

Improving public access and increasing awareness has been a key strategic goal of the agency for several years.  A part of that goal was to outsource and develop a National Contact Center in 2006.  The EEOC contracted with a private vendor to field calls and questions about employment-related discrimination complaints.
 

Pierre says that the contact center did increase public access, which most likely contributed to the 9 percent increase in charge filings in 2007.  Before the contact center opened, incoming calls were routed to the EEOC regional offices, and the call volume nearly overwhelmed the agency's staff.
 

The outsourced contact center became the center of controversy when several of the agency's commissioners questioned the center's efficiency and the reasons for outsourcing call operations.  On Dec. 19, 2007, the EEOC cancelled the call center contract and decided to bring the center's operations in-house.
 

Because the EEOC staff was not prepared to handle the call volume when the contact center shut down, the agency placed a questionnaire or assessment system online on Dec. 20, 2007.  The assessment system was adapted from an intake questionnaire that the now-defunct outsourced call center began sending out in December 2006.  Any person who visits the EEOC web site and is interested in filing a discrimination complaint is now directed to the online system.
 

"The online assessment system should help reduce the number of phone calls the EEOC receives, and it makes it much easier for someone to make initial contact and begin the process of filing a discrimination complaint," said Pierre.
 

EEOC officials are careful to point out that filling out an assessment form does not constitute a formal charge under the agency's rules.  The questionnaire merely gives the agency a tool to assess whether more information should be gathered before a formal charge can be filed.

The charge-to-inquiry rate was 55 percent in fiscal 2007 compared to 43 percent in 2006.  EEOC officials say that an increase of inquiries received in 2007 coupled with the rise in the percentage of inquiries becoming formal charges did contribute to the 9 percent jump in charge filings for 2007.

 

Other Theories
Several sources familiar with the issue say that the recent Supreme Court ruling in Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki is also driving the increase by clarifying the time frame for charge filings and what constitutes a charge.

"The Holowecki case is definitely having an effect on the number of charge filings being made with the EEOC," said Don Livingston, an attorney with the Washington, D.C., law firm of Akin Gump and a former general counsel of the EEOC.  "I think the evidence is pretty clear in the number of charge filings in 2007, and it should continue in 2008."

EEOC officials don’t agree with Livingston’s contention and claim that several different issues are affecting the increase in the charge-to-inquiry rates such as better information gathering and improved communications with people who make the inquiries.

 

These improved communications procedures could be the direct result of the court case, according to Livingston and other sources, who said they believe the agency is looking to prevent further legal troubles.

 

EEOC officials admit that the agency's information gathering capabilities were greatly enhanced after opening the in-house call center on March 17, 2008.  From December 2007 to March 2008, the agency was fielding calls through its regional offices while preparing to open the call center by hiring and training 61 people.

 

"The in-house contact center is working well, and we will keep working to smooth out any problems and make the system better and more accessible to those who need and want the EEOC's help," Pierre said.

 

Employer Role Is Debated

Judging from the response to the online assessment form and the growing number of calls the center receives, it appears that the EEOC outreach is working.  Still the uptick in discrimination complaints in 2007 did grab attention and headlines and was the highest volume of incoming charges since 2002.  Naomi Earp, chair of the commission, expressed concern over the increase and urged employers to examine their hiring and firing practices.

 

"Corporate America needs to do a better job of proactively preventing discrimination and addressing complaints promptly and effectively," Earp said.  "To ensure that equality of opportunity becomes a reality in the 21st century workplace, employers need to place a premium on fostering inclusive and discrimination-free work environments for all individuals."

 

While the improvements to public access by opening new communication channels appear to have had an impact on charge filings, causes for the jump such as the economic downturn and the cyclical nature of the U.S. labor market have been considered, as well.  However EEOC officials and sources familiar with the issue said they don’t believe that the spike in discrimination complaints stems from a sudden outbreak of bad practices and bad behavior from U.S. employers.

 

"I don't think we're facing an epidemic of employers suddenly doing the wrong thing and discriminating against workers," said Rae Vann, general counsel for the Equal Employment Advisory Council.  "Most employers want to do the right thing.  I do believe we are seeing the combined effects of poor economic conditions and the improved outreach and communication efforts by the EEOC."

 

Still the rising number of complaints is troubling to Vann and other sources.  "I think it does show that while we have made strides for equal employment opportunities in this country, we still have a lot of work to ensure that the workplace rights of all Americans are protected and observed," Vann said.
 

Back to the Newsletter

 Copyright © 2003-2008 HR-OneSource