Are Coffee Shop Managers Exempt From the FLSA?
A
Starbuck’s coffee shop claimed that two of its managers were
exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA). The managers claimed that most of
their time (70 percent to 80 percent) was spent on routine
tasks such as pouring coffee, waiting on customers, cleaning
up, and performing many of the same tasks handled by
non-management employees.
The
store managers were the highest-ranking employees in their
stores and supervised as many as 30 employees, including
assistant managers and shift supervisors. The managers also
were responsible for increasing revenues, controlling costs,
and ensuring compliance with corporate policies. While
acknowledging that they exercised some managerial authority,
the two managers claimed that they were “glorified
baristas” who should not be considered executive
employees under the DOL regulations.
Award:
The managers were executive employees and therefore not
entitled to overtime pay under the FLSA, the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Texas decided January 2,
2007. (Mims v. Starbucks Corp)
The
court said that even if the managers spent the majority of
their working time on “barista tasks,” like pouring coffee,
their employer considered their most important duty to be
the management functions that affected the success of each
store.
Courts
have not applied a simple “clock” standard to determine an
employee's primary duty, the court said. The managers
acknowledged that they led other employees by example, and
served as role models for non-supervisory employees, the
court said. For example, pouring coffee for customers not
only assisted in the basic operation of a store, but also
served to train other employees, it said.
Even if
the employees spent the majority of their time on nonexempt
tasks, the court said, their non-management work was of less
importance to Starbucks than the “management
responsibilities that directly influenced the ultimate
commercial and financial success or failure of the store.”
The two
store managers also exercised discretion in interviewing,
hiring, training, and making disciplinary decisions, as well
as deciding employee assignments and determining how much
inventory to maintain in their stores, the court said.
Even
with oversight or control by district managers, the court
said, the store managers still were the highest-ranking
employees in their stores, were paid nearly twice as much as
employees without management duties, and received bonuses
that were available only to store managers. “This marked
disparity in pay and benefits between Plaintiffs and the
non-exempt employees is a hallmark of exempt status,” the
court said.
If you have
any questions regarding FLSA in your workplace, please
contact Jack Lipovac or Clint Davis at HR-OneSource
(515) 221-1718,
lipovacj@hr-onesource.com or
davisc@hr-onesource.com.